Editorial Policy

This policy sets out the editorial standards GMONY uses to present market news, company information, analysis and educational material clearly and responsibly.

Last updated: 2 October 2026

Editorial responsibility

GMONY is published by Ak Bhardwaj. Article bylines identify the named author. Our editorial aim is to help readers understand the subject, the evidence and the limits of the information, rather than to promise investment outcomes. This policy describes our standards; it is not a claim that every archived article has already been independently audited.

Sources and verification

Reports should give readers a way to identify important sources. For company announcements and financial results, primary sources such as exchange filings, issuer announcements, annual reports and official regulatory publications should be preferred. When reporting another publication’s findings or a brokerage view, the source and relevant date should be stated.

Figures should identify the currency, units and reporting period where relevant. Reported facts, estimates and opinions should be distinguishable. Where a claim cannot be verified confidently, uncertainty should be stated rather than replaced by a definitive assertion.

News, analysis and price targets

News reports describe developments; analysis interprets information; forecasts explore possible outcomes using assumptions. These should not be presented as interchangeable. A company price target or projected return is not an assured result. A brokerage BUY rating should be attributed to that brokerage and should not be presented as GMONY’s personalised recommendation.

Headlines and images

Headlines should represent the article accurately and avoid unsupported promises of profits. Thumbnails should relate to the story. A graphic containing “LIVE” or “BREAKING” does not establish that an archived article is a current live report; the publication date and article text remain important. Misleading headlines, labels or illustrations can be reported for review.

Dates and updates

The publication date identifies when a story first appeared. Material revisions should be described clearly, especially when a correction changes a financial figure or conclusion. A formatting or design change should not be used to imply that an old market development has just occurred. Archived information may remain useful as a record while no longer being current.

AI and automated assistance

AI-assisted writing, summaries or scenarios require human review before they are relied upon as reporting. Automated output is not a primary source and can contain invented facts, inaccurate calculations or misleading confidence. Articles discussing an AI forecast should identify its speculative nature and relevant assumptions. Automatic language translations can contain errors and should be compared with the original text and sources for important decisions.

Independence and commercial relationships

Sponsored content, affiliate links and advertisements should be identified where they appear. Commercial arrangements should not be represented as independent verification, regulatory approval or a guarantee of returns. Relevant interests should be disclosed when they may affect how readers understand a story. See the Advertising Disclosure.

Corrections and reader feedback

Specific concerns are reviewed using the article, relevant sources and evidence supplied by the reader. Material factual errors should be corrected clearly. Read the Corrections Policy and use Contact to report an issue. We welcome constructive, evidence-based feedback.